Mike Adams — Natural News Dec 27, 2017
As we now sit in one of the coldest “chill waves” in America’s history, with NYC poised to break the record for the coldest New Year’s Eve ever, it’s noteworthy to recall how all the “climate change” experts used to be global warming alarmists.
Just a few years ago, these global warming experts told us that winter temperatures would get steadily warmer. Snowfall would decrease, and the Earth would become so warm that the ice caps would melt and inundate coastal cities under a tidal wave of rising ocean levels. In reality, however, snow cover has continued to increase since the 1950s, but this didn’t stop mainstream media fake news rags like Newsweek from claiming exactly the opposite.
The IPCC also pushed the global warming narrative in 2001, and Al Gore and other global warming alarmists heaped on terror-scale warnings about melting ice that would drown cities like New York and Miami (as if liquid water instead of frozen ice is somehow bad for the planet…).
“Progressive” science: FAKE the data!
When the scientific data didn’t fit their narrative, of course, they faked the data. Nearly all the data used for so-called “global warming” projections, it turns out, had been dishonestly altered in order to create a “warming trend” where none exists at all. In another example of science hucksterism, global warming alarmists have been caught red-handed faking sea level data in order to falsely support their “rising oceans” narrative. As explained by the NoTricksZone website:
In a new paper published in Earth Systems and Environment this month, Australian scientists Dr. Albert Parker and Dr. Clifford Ollier uncover evidence that Permanent Service for Mean Sea Level (PSMSL) overseers appear to have been engaging in the “highly questionable” and “suspicious” practice of adjusting historical tide gauge data to show recent accelerated sea level rise where no such acceleration (or rise) exists.
The authors expose how PSMSL data-adjusters make it appear that stable sea levels can be rendered to look like they are nonetheless rising at an accelerated pace
This adjustment of tide gauge data to yield a rising sea level trend where none exists is not occasional or episodic. Instead, for every adjustment of raw data analyzed, “the adjustments are always in the direction to produce a large rise in sea level.”
The suspicious perpetuity of this pattern strongly suggests that there is an agenda driving these arbitrary and subjective realignments.
The global warming hoax couldn’t be reconciled with global temperature and ocean level data… so they morphed the science hoax into “climate change”
The problem with the global warming narrative, of course, is that it contradicted the scientific evidence which clearly showed the Earth wasn’t warming as had been frighteningly predicted by apocalyptic global warming alarmists. So they changed the narrative to “climate change,” which is now recognized as one of the most stupid-headed science fails of all time, given that Earth’s climate has always demonstrated rapid change, long before modern humans arrived on the scene. Perhaps that’s why over 31,000 scientists now say global warming is a complete hoax.
Now, thanks to the climate change hoax narrative, a shockingly high percentage of liberals actually believe that there were no forest fires, no hurricanes, no tornadoes, no floods, no droughts and no snow storms before the invention of the combustion engine (and the subsequent burning of fossil fuels). No one has ever told them, for example, that carbon dioxide levels have been over ten times higher than today’s levels throughout Earth’s history. Because of the Left’s runaway science denialism, college students have also been taught that carbon dioxide is a poison rather than plant food. In truth, nearly all plants on Earth consume carbon dioxide as a critical nutrient. Higher CO2 means more rainforests, faster growth of food crops and more “green” planet-wide. Yet stupidly, Leftists have been brainwashed to believe that CO2 is toxic to the planet. (Which just goes to show you how liberalism can convince some people that 1+1 = 5.)