Like
Like Love Haha Wow Sad Angry


Introduction — July 25, 2018

The acid attack in Worcester that left a 3-year-old burned is bad enough. However, what is really appalling about this case is the media coverage. Or more precisely, what the media failed to report.
There is one salient fact central to this story that many corporate media outlets were pointedly silent about. See if you can spot what’s missing.

Worcester Acid Attack: Five Men Charged Following Attack On Boy, 3

Kathryn Snowden — Huffington Post July 25, 2018

Suspects involved in acid attack caught on CCTV. Click to enlarge

Five men have been charged following a suspected acid attack on a three-year-old boy at the weekend.

West Mercia Police said three men from London, aged 22, 25 and 26, and a 39-year-old and 41-year-old from Wolverhampton have been charged with conspiracy to commit grievous bodily.

They are due before magistrates in Kidderminster on Wednesday.

The force said it would not be releasing the names of those who have been charged.

The boy suffered serious burns to his face and an arm in the alleged incident at Home Bargains in Tallow Hill on Saturday afternoon.

He was discharged from hospital on Sunday after treatment but the long-term implications of his injuries are as yet unknown.

Source

Comment — July 25, 2018

The following BBC report also omits to mention the same crucial information. Is this a coincidence? Or are the Huffington Post, the BBC and most of the mainstream media being instructed on how to report certain news items?
Readers will recall how in the run-up to the 2003 Iraq invasion we were inundated with reports about Saddam Hussein and his Weapons of Mass Destruction.
The BBC even broadcast interviews with what it described as credible witnesses to Iraq’s WMD program. Like engineer Adnan al-Haideri, who claimed  that the weapons “have been hidden away in heavily populated areas, even under a hospital in Baghdad.”
Except that they weren’t. No trace of them were ever found but such talk helped pave the way for the 2003 invasion.
Little has changed since then. The corporate media is still trading in what amounts to disinformation. Although now it works through omission rather than outright lies.
The following BBC report covers exactly the same incident as the Huffington Post and like the Huff Post it makes exactly the same omission. See if you can guess what is not being reported?

Worcester ‘acid attack’: Five men are charged

BBC Online — July 25, 2018

Five men have been charged with conspiracy to commit grievous bodily harm following a suspected acid attack on a three-year-old boy.

Three men from London, aged 22, 25 and 26, and two from Wolverhampton, aged 39 and 41, are due in court later.

The boy suffered serious burns to his face and an arm at the Home Bargains store in Worcester on Saturday.

West Mercia Police said it would not be releasing the identities of the men who have been charged.

They are due to appear at Kidderminster Magistrates’ Court on Wednesday.

The suspected attack occurred in the Tallow Hill area of Worcester at about 14:15 BST on Saturday.

The child was treated at the scene by paramedics and taken to hospital for treatment.

He was discharged the following day but the long-term implications of his injuries are not yet known.

Source

The Prime Suspect in the Acid Attack is …

Comment — July 25, 2018

The BBC and the Huffington Post both omit to mention that the father of the child burned with acid and the chief suspect in the case is in fact an Afghan asylum seeker.
Apparently the man had tracked down his ex-wife to Worcester after she had left him. She was the intended victim but the three-year-old was splashed with acid when the father threw the acid at his mother.
The mother’s 41-year-old father is still being questioned by police over his possible involvement in the attack on his daughter.
The question is why this information about the attacker is being omitted from news reports? We would suggest that the mainstream news media has been instructed not to highlight such facts so as not to stir public concern about the unregulated influx of ‘asylum seekers’.
Naturally there are exceptions in the media’s coverage, like the much maligned Daily Mail. But the general trend in the media’s reporting this case has been to ignore these facts, as significant as they are. Ed.
Like
Like Love Haha Wow Sad Angry